Matthew Sheffield is a conservative Christian journalist who became disillusioned with the Republican Party and right-wing journalism. I read an essay he wrote a couple of years ago comparing mainstream media, which he had once believed was liberal, with the conservative media ecosystem.
According to Sheffield, mainstream media was about process. They may have had a left-leaning bias, but in almost all cases, they went where the facts led them, they followed widely accepted journalistic standards, and they reported what they found, regardless of who it hurt or benefited.
By contrast, conservative media outlets were outcome oriented. More often than not, they decided what story they wanted to report, and then they only paid attention to facts that bolstered that story. In the end, the resulting story they reported was what mattered to them, not the process they used to get there. Their conservative readers and viewers didn’t want their chosen media platform to challenge their beliefs. They would only accept stories that confirmed what they already believed.
This outcome over process methodology is at the heart of many of the differences we see between conservatives and liberals, and by extension, Republicans and Democrats. It’s the difference that makes all of the difference in our politics.
A good example of this concept at work can be seen in Donald Trump’s many civil and criminal trials. For Trump, as with any civil or criminal defendant, due process is essential to having a fair and just outcome of their trial. And like all civil and criminal defendants, Trump was afforded due process.
In the criminal trial where he was convicted of 34 felonies, an investigation was conducted, evidence was presented to a grand jury, an indictment was issued, a trial date was set taking into account his schedule, a jury was selected with input from his attorneys, witnesses were called by both sides and both sides were allowed to question the witnesses, the jury that Trump’s attorneys helped select deliberated over the evidence and unanimously found him guilty on all charges. The legally dictated process was followed. The outcome was a result of that process.
But talk to a Trump supporter and they will ignore the due process Trump was afforded and instead talk about who financially supported the campaign of the prosecuting attorney. They will bring up the political affiliation of the judge’s daughter. They’ll claim that the jury was rigged and the witnesses against Trump lied (although the witnesses for Trump were beyond reproach). They’ll make the unfounded accusation that Biden weaponized the Department of Justice to go after Trump, despite the fact that the charges against Trump were state charges, the trial was held in a state court prosecuted by attorneys for the state, and the Department of Justice had nothing to do with the case.
Those who support Trump are not concerned with the process that was followed and legally mandated to insure the fairest trial possible. The only thing they care about is the outcome. And when the outcome wasn’t what they wanted, they went on the attack, defending Trump and making excuses for his conviction.
This attitude of outcome over process can be seen in the calls to “lock her up” at Trump rallies. It can be seen in the call to deport immigrants, including those who are in the country legally. It can be seen in Trump’s pledge to prosecute his political opponents. No process is required, such as the breaking of an applicable law, a trial, a vigorous defense, etc. If Trump says it, then it should be done, regardless of process.
Of course, this attitude extends to the election as well. In 2020, Trump’s own administration acknowledged that the presidential election was the freest and fairest in our country’s history. Despite that fact, Trump and his supporters refused to accept the results of the election. The process didn’t matter. The only thing that mattered was the outcome.
Trump is already setting the stage to claim voter fraud in the 2024 election, and he has all but said that, unless he wins, he will not accept the outcome. He routinely tells anyone who will listen that the only way he can lose the election is if Kamala Harris and the Democrats cheat. He provides no proof for this claim, yet his supporters parrot it.
The electoral process (there’s that word again) is set up to provide the fairest results possible while still making voting convenient for American citizens. History has proven that there is no outcome-determinative fraud in early voting, mail-in voting, or in-person voting. We have seen the proof of this in election after election. Yet Trump and his supporters attack the process, claiming widespread fraud without providing any evidence, and claiming that, unless he wins, the election is rigged.
Process is provided for in nearly every aspect of democracy. But Trump and his followers have abandoned process (except when it favors them) in favor of outcome. They don’t want to follow the process before achieving a result. They simply want to dictate the outcome, with no regard for process. This, in a nutshell, is the difference between democracy and fascism. And if Trump is elected, process will take a backseat to his desired outcome, regardless or the rule of law or our established traditions.


There are plenty of reasons not to vote for Donald Trump. I could come up with a dozen or more right now off the top of my head. In fact, Donald Trump has done so many despicable, irresponsible, undemocratic, authoritarian things since he first came down the golden escalator in 2015 that I’ve lost track of them, my memory unable to keep up with the sheer number of horrible, unpresidential things he’s said and done.
I’ve recently been taken to task for comparing Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler and George Wallace. The people who take exception to these comparisons view Trump in a substantially different light than I do. They also don’t seem to realize that before Hitler gassed the Jews and other “undesirables,” and before Wallace supported turning fire hoses on black protesters while peacefully protesting, their words foreshadowed the actions they would eventually take. Likewise, Trump’s words are foreshadowing a dark, authoritarian future if he wins next month’s election and is allowed to re-occupy the White House.
I have long been a fan of Teddy Roosevelt’s politics (he was a progressive Republican when that was still possible) and his amazing life. I ran across an X (formerly Twitter) thread that did a great job of capturing exactly what an extraordinary character Roosevelt really was.

2. President McKinley appointed Roosevelt as Assistant Secretary of the Navy in 1897. When the USS Maine mysteriously exploded in Havana Harbor, tensions with Spain hit a boiling point. Roosevelt didn’t waste time – he sent Commodore George Dewey to the Philippines, giving him the green light to take down the Spanish fleet.
3. Roosevelt formed a volunteer cavalry regiment known as the Rough Riders. He pulled together a wild mix of cowboys, miners, Ivy League athletes, & anyone ready to fight, regardless of background. They shipped off to Cuba, and at the Battle of San Juan Hill, Roosevelt led the charge on horseback, earning fame for his bravery.
4. When Roosevelt returned from Cuba as a war hero, he ran for Governor of New York in 1898 and won. His reformist agenda made political bosses nervous, so in 1900, they pushed for him to run as Vice President under McKinley, thinking he’d be sidelined in the largely ceremonial role. It wasn’t George Steinbrenner and Brian Cashman, but Republican Party leaders like Senator Thomas Platt who wanted him out of New York politics.
5. As President, Roosevelt tackled labor disputes head-on, famously mediating the 1902 Coal Strike to prevent a national energy crisis. He earned the nickname “Trust Buster” by breaking up monopolies like Standard Oil. He also spearheaded the construction of the Panama Canal, revolutionizing global trade.
6. In 1912, while campaigning for a third presidential term, Roosevelt was shot in the chest by a would-be assassin in Milwaukee. Undeterred, he insisted on delivering his speech, famously declaring, “It takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose!”
7. In 1906, Roosevelt made history by becoming the first sitting president to win the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in mediating the end of the Russo-Japanese War. He worked tirelessly to broker a peace agreement between Russia & Japan, securing a treaty that ended years of conflict.
8. Roosevelt studied boxing after being bullied as a child and continued with the sport through college at Harvard. And he didn’t let a little thing like becoming president stop him from boxing – he would often box during his time in the Oval Office. That is, until he was blinded in one eye. He wrote in his autobiography:
9. Devastated after losing his final presidential election, Roosevelt dealt with his grief by going on an adventure. Accompanied by his son Kermit and famed explorer Colonel Candido Rondon, they set off on a journey down an uncharted, anaconda- and piranha-infested river in South America known as the River of Doubt.
10. While living in North Dakota, Roosevelt became a deputy sheriff. During this time, he once pursued three boat thieves through a frozen river. After capturing them, he personally took them to Dickinson for trial, rather than allow them to be hanged by vigilantes. On the journey, he watched them for over 36 hours straight without sleep – reading Tolstoy to keep himself occupied. Roosevelt wrote:
11. After his wife and mother died – on the same day – Roosevelt grieved in his own unique way: by leaving the city behind for the wild of the American West to become a cowboy.
Imagine for a moment that you’re a single woman who has been asked out by a guy that your friends know. They’ve socialized with him, worked with him, even worked for him. In total, you know 44 different people that know him, and of those 44 people, only 4 give him a good recommendation. That’s right, 40 of the 44 people who know this guy say you shouldn’t go out with him. What would you do?
The first time I met Mojo, he was living near Chattanooga and going by the name Cujo. He was in the fenced backyard of a woman I knew. A few years earlier, her house had been burglarized and she wanted a dog to help protect the property. She bought Mojo as a puppy and immediately sent him to a trainer to be taught how to be a guard dog. When he got home to her, she couldn’t get him to obey her commands, so she put him in the backyard and left him there for three-and-a-half years.
In 1963, the United States was a segregated nation. In many communities, Black people were not allowed to drink from the same water fountains as white people. They were not allowed to sit at the same lunch counter or attend the same schools. But things were beginning to change.
Kris Kristofferson was one of a kind. He was a soldier, a scholar, a singer, a songwriter, an actor, and a cultural icon. Many people have been one or two of these things. Kris Kristofferson was the whole package.
An internet meme is circulating around social media using a Bible verse to justify mistreating immigrants and deporting them from the country. Here’s what the verse, Deuteronomy 28:43-44, says: